Reading:

1. Halle (1990) An Approach to Morphology.  Proceedings of the North East
	Linguistics Society 20, Vol.1, 150-184.  Amherst: GLSA, University
	of Massachusetts, Amherst.
	[Vera will report on this]

2. Zwicky & Pullum (1992) A misconceived approach to Morphology.  Proceedings of
	WCCFL 91, Dawn Bates, ed., 387-398.  Palo Alto: CSLI, Stanford.
	[Ascander will report on this]

[We discuss [1] and [2] on 10/05/05]

3. Halle & Marantz (1993) Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.
	The View from Building 20, Hale & Keyser, eds., 111-176.  Cambridge:
	MIT Press.

4. Harley & Noyer (1999) Distributed Morphology. GLOT International 4:3-9.  PDF
	at http://linguistics.arizona.edu/~hharley/PDFs/HarleyNoyerDM1999.pdf

5. Trommer, Jochen (1999) Morphology consuming syntax' resources: generation and
	parsing in a minimalist version of distributed morphology.  Proceedings
	of ESSLI Workshop on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars, Nijmegen
	1999.  Download at http://www.ling.uni-osnabrueck.de/trommer/papers.html
	[Dave will report on this]

[We discuss [4] and [5] along with [3] on 10/12/05]

Halle & Marantz (1994) Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology. MITWPL 21:
	Papers on Phonology and Morphology, Carnie & Harley, eds., 275-288.
	Cambridge: MITWPL.

Halle (1997) Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. MIT WPL 30:
	PF -- Papers at the Interface, 425-449.  MITWPL, MIT, Cambridge.

Embick (2000) Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect.
	LI 31:185-230.

Embick & Noyer (2001) Movement Operations after Syntax. LI 32:555-595.

Hankamer & Mikkelsen (2005) When Movement must be Blocked: A Reply to Embick and
	Noyer.  Linguistic Inquiry 36.1:85-125.